Some individuals believe that when we give feedback to our classmates in schools or colleagues in work conditions, we need to give them negative comments first. Since people have the belief that negative feedback can faciliate the assignments. Nevertheless, I think I will give the positive comments in such circummustance.
First and foremost, positive comments can enhance the work efficiency. If people recive the positive feedback from others, they will be happy and be more willing to do the job. Take my friend Johnson for example, he and I both work at a company which is famous from the design of public buildings. We had a trouble when we struggled with a difficult proposal for city airport’s new terminal. When I recive his design, I gave him positive and encourage feedback first with negative answers additionaly. He was confident when recived my message, and eventually we finished design faster than before. In the contrast, if I just gave him negative comments firstly, he would be frustrated and upset about the work.
Second, positive comments can lead easy changes in works or assignments. During the collabration, if friends put objective and postive message firstly, they will work in a better atmosphere. People are instinctly hoping good message from each other, and a relative mild attitude in feedback can bring such good information. When collegues get positive feedback, they will reduce the barrier in their mental, and will less reluctant revise their works. If we just put negative or criticise things on title of our feedback, the reciver will unhappy to get understanding of our advice.
Finally, some people may hold a attitude that criticise can make enhancement because it can push our colleagues to quickly solve the problem. However, if we just focus on negative aspect of the question, we will frequantly lose our patient, at the consequnce, we will tap into many meaningless conflicts and arguements. Therefore, we need to give reciver a good impression first, and then elaborate our discussions or debatations.
In conclusion, there are a lot of thinking on how to give advice to our friends or working parteners, and the discussion about that always fall into unceasely talking. In my opinion, we should initially give our friendly and peacefully information, to get the trust and conprehence from our classmates or colleagues, then we can enhance our collabration and know eachother better.
- Some people believe that friendships become stronger when friends enjoy good times together Others believe that friendships become stronger when friends talk about their problems with each other and support each other Which of these two approaches do you 85
- Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun 70
- 1 If you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 81
- 1 If you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 81
- 1 If you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d to give them negative comments first. Since people have the belief that negative fe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...dvice. Finally, some people may hold a attitude that criticise can make enhanc...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19493670886 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94402623941 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524050632911 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0312017563 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245188533142 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920640866292 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877427490264 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162887224066 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109553005909 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.