Some individuals hold the belief that traditional energy sources such as coal or oil are less expensive than cleaner energy sources, so these sources are more dependable and practical. However, I think we should use cleaner energy sources to preserve our environment. I will elaborate on my discussion for three reasons.
First and foremost, cleaner energy can increase social efficiency since it can improve the quality of the environment and reduce pollution. For factories with lots of employees, a better atmosphere can bring improved working conditions, which can enhance the output of the manufacturers definitely. In many developing countries, a constrained environment caused by conventional energy sources usually lowers employee motivation, as a consequence, the quality and the quantity of products are restrained by disgruntled manufacturers. Obviously, if these developing nations use cleaner energy, their environment will gradually improve and so their overall social efficiency will increase.
Secondly, cleaner energy can be the catalyst for technological advancement. When people tap into new cleaner energy, they will embrace the new technology to have a better understanding of cleaner energy. For instance, wind farms need a lot of scientists to struggle with the material to produce a durable generator of electricity, which can clearly improve the level of the technology. In contrast, if people just focus on traditional energy sources, they will somewhat hinder the relative technology's enhancement, since they just notice how to use the energy sources instead of how to develop new methods to find new energy sources. In this fast-changing world, the lack of new technology is so harmful to a country or a company.
Finally, some people will keep the opinion that traditional energy sources are affordable to use and can bring the possibility of economic benefits. Nevertheless, I want to remind them that traditional energy sources are not reusable and cannot be recycled. In the use of oil or coal, we will find that the number of them is going down so quickly, and eventually, the number will go to zero. In this turn, the price of the traditional will be higher due to the lack of them.
In conclusion, energy use is crossing a lot of fields around the world, so it is a complicated question for many people to bother with it. However, I still believe that in the 21st-century world, we need to focus more on new cleaner energy, it is beneficial for both the environment and for ourselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...l be higher due to the lack of them. In conclusion, energy use is crossing a lo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05413634581 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483950617284 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8860989046 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31160603515 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101039535793 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934857655488 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186562839052 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842689588462 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.