The reading piece and the lecture are regarding the usage of vessels found in Iraq. According to the author of the reading, the vessels certainly could not have been used for generating electricity whereas the lecturer hold antithetical opinion. The lecturer casts doubts on the main points made in the reading.
Preeminently, according to the reading, the vessel was not used for generating electricity as there were no metal wires which would have been used as conductors. However, the lecturer refutes this point. The lecturer points out that the vessels were found by local people who are not trained archaeologist, they might not have been able to recognize the material. In addition, she elucidates that there is a possibility that the wires were just overlooked or thrown away as they could have been considered not so interesting.
By the same token, the reading states that the cylinder found inside the vessel were very similar to that of cylinder which were found in Seleucia. Furthermore, the author asserts that they might be of the same use that is to hold scrolls. Nevertheless, the lecturer disputes this point. The lecturer affirms that this might have been the initial use of the vessels but might have changed over a period of time. The lecturer suggests that there might have been discovery that iron rod along with some liquid in the vessel could produce electricity which could also mark the initial production of electricity in ancient times.
In winding up, the reading contends that there was no use of electricity. There were no appliances that operated on electricity hence, the discovery would be of little importance. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that they could have used it to produce mild shock or produce tingling sensation. Ancient people were fond of magic and could boost that they had invisible powers. Mild shocks could also have been used for healing purpose as it is used in today's modern science.
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 73
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reaso 50
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line The vessel was about 2 200 years old Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod The 3
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- Independent TOEFL essay TPO 9 Agree or disagree Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 70
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as there were no metal wires which would have been used as conductors. However, t...
^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e vessels but might have changed over a period of time. The lecturer suggests that there might...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
... of little importance. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that they could have used it ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03395061728 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58974527656 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450617283951 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3845070185 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9411764706 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0733760308436 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275428287294 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241978462206 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529425971826 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166973705176 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as there were no metal wires which would have been used as conductors. However, t...
^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e vessels but might have changed over a period of time. The lecturer suggests that there might...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
... of little importance. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that they could have used it ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03395061728 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58974527656 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450617283951 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3845070185 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9411764706 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0733760308436 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275428287294 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241978462206 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529425971826 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166973705176 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.