usage of these cooper cylinders as electric batteries in the antiquity

Essay topics:

usage of these cooper cylinders as electric batteries in the antiquity

The article and the lecture are both about the discovery of vessels and the usage of these cooper cylinders as electric batteries in the antiquity. While the author cats doubt on the mentioned hypothesis, the speaker challenges his arguments with three specific reasons.

First and foremost, the reading passage states that the found excavations are only vessels. Consequently, due to the fact that the batery can not work without electricity conductors, the writer disprove the idea that the discovered materials were used as batteries. On the other hand, the professor argues that if trained experts would take part in the process, they could also been able to detect wires. As a result, local people might have thrown them away.

Secondly, the writer relates that the similarity between the cylinders found in the ruins of Seleucia, used for holding scrolls of sacred texts, and those in Iraq, do not provide us an explanation about the theory of generating electricity. The lecturer contends it by explaining that it might have been primarly used for the same reason but it is surely adapted later for generating electricity.

Thirdly, the author brings his argument to a close by claiming that the ancient people have surely found these vessels useless due to the lack of electronic devices. While this point is denied by the teacher. Moreover, he supports his opinion by providing several ways of usage such as the belief of invisible power, magic and healing methods used by doctors to stimulate muscles.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-24 pativ7 83 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... due to the lack of electronic devices. While this point is denied by the teacher. Mo...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13306451613 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59747223137 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3704769184 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.727272727 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166086960979 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596691415402 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13368062782 0.0662205650399 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10617065506 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117545245402 0.0443174109184 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.