The two tables compare the percentages of various languages’ speaking ability of british students at a university in the UK between 2000 and 2010.
It is clear that the percentages of bilingual and trilingual students increased during the decade. Proportions of students who were nonnative speaker of French dropped, while proportions of other languages, except the percentage of German which stood still, climbed from 2000 to 2010.
In 2000, unilingual students occupied 20% of total. Percentage of bilingual students were 70% in total which consisted of 15% French, 10% German, 30% Spanish and 15% other languages, while trilingual students only accounted for 10%. However, students who were unilingual became less, proportions of ability in speaking another foreign language rose in the following decade.
By contrast, data in 2010 shows that the percentage of unilingual students was relative low at 10%, while bilingual students and trilingual students consist 75% and 15% of total respectively. Though percentage of Spanish-speaking, another language speaking, and trilingual students both grew by 5% to respective 35%, 20% and 15%, the opposite trend can be seen on proportions of students who spoke French or German only as foreign languages which dropped by 5% to 10% and another one remained unchanged at 10%.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017 11
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 73
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, still, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46341463415 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98153747833 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.398633332 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314119616914 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157833376694 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756874641429 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224405441872 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387465363698 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.