Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
One of the characteristics of successful leaders is the sense of responsibility for accepting their mistakes.
Leadership and management are the most important pillars of each society in today’s world. Due to the fact, we live in a fast-speed and chaotic world, it is necessary for us to have a good plan and guidelines for our lives. Although we all have certain plans for our lives individually, having a detailed plan for a successful life is important even for a small society like school teams or family.
A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether one of the successful leadership’s characters is responsible for accepting mistakes. Some people possess the conviction that this statement is agreeable and has a sense, whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that there are many features that can define as a most important characteristic of a successful leader. I am personally content that this issue is multifaceted. Although the definition of a successful leader is not concluded by a sense of responsibility and, equally important, there are many factors that can affect leadership, I’d rather continue with the second attribute. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is that if leaders have this ability that learns from their mistakes, they have a complete perspective. In this regard, when team members are faced with a hard situation, a leader can guide them to the right decision and prevent them from astray. Consequently, it makes unity in the team. Consider my personal experience to make this point more clear. In the previous role, I had a small team that was different from each other in all aspects of their lives, including sex, education, and soft skills. There was a huge misunderstood and argument in our daily meeting. One day, we faced a big deal in our project that I faced before that. I know team members should match each other to pass that situation. I could manage them perfectly and we gain a big profit from that project.
The second rationale reason behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that leaders are responsible to understand the team member’s situation and, equally important, a perspective does not gain without mistakes. When people get to gather and accompany each other, they get familiar with each other. Leaders maybe failed to get communication with some team members but they can get experience in with dealing them. In a hard situation, the leader's character will be trained.
In brief, due to the aforementioned reasons, I agree with this statement that one of the characteristics of successful leaders is the sense of responsibility for accepting their mistakes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 85 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | porteghale Abiasli | 76 | view |
- grades encourage students to learn more 76
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Agree or disagree 61
- Governments should of er a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot af ord the tuition 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important problems in today s world will be solved in our lifetime 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 438, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... dealing them. In a hard situation, the leaders character will be trained. In brief, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, whereas, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2265.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07847533632 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97357519663 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515695067265 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2111609247 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.954545455 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.40909090909 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261511471519 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711621683863 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111078681696 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200093849275 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173466416316 0.0645574589148 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.