Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.

Helping the poor and caring about low rate income people are the most important pillars of each society in today's world. Due to the fact, we live in a chaotic and fast-speed world, it is crucial for us to pay more attention to our environment. As we all know, prices rose dramatically and it is hard for people to effort in their lives. A controversial question that is often raised regarded to this issue is whether Nowadays people are more willing to help other people whereas they behave as in the past. Some people possess the conviction that the former has a more chance to occur whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that people's behaviors are constant during the time. I am personally content that this issue is multifaceted. Although helping poor people have positive consequences on our lives, I'd rather go with the first approach. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is there is more situation in that people need help rather than in the past. As I mentioned before, prices rose and people couldn't afford their lives even thou they work more than a shift. In this situation, some people who have a better income, help other people to have normal lives. Consider my personal experience to make this point more clear. There was a poor family who lived in our neighborhood. They were companion people but they had not enough food to eat. My family every month helped and brought them some clothes, pieces of bread, and eggs. Near school time, I brought a school staff for their children. I never forgot their happy face after those gifts. They felt that they were not alone.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that in the past everybody have a job. Nowadays there is more graduate student who is unemployed and has no job. As they are talented but the job market is full. Furthermore, there are some companies and employees who prefer their friends and families instead of qualified people.
In brief, due to the aforementioned reasons, I agree with this statement that nowadays people are more willing to help people.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2023-07-20	Zmx_109	90	view
2023-04-19	Mitra-T	80	view
2023-04-19	Hossein2000	88	view
2023-03-04	hamidbrz	71	view
2023-02-10	redark777	90	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user porteghale Abiasli :

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 818, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...ave positive consequences on our lives, Id rather go with the first approach. To s...
^^
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...entioned before, prices rose and people couldnt afford their lives even thou they work ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, whereas, in brief

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81102362205 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51506301798 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540682414698 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9862675416 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6956521739 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5652173913 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52173913043 5.45110844103 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383810811515 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104433035271 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889156682597 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234001293791 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868216526708 0.0645574589148 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.