Government should fund scientific research rather than commercial organizations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Governments play a significant role in the advancement of the globe. It is believed that the fund of governments should be diverted to devepment of science in lieu of businesses. I am of the idea that both areas should be given equal support from the national fund.
Scientific studies is of primary importance to safeguard the survival of mankind and pave the way for future humans' future development. Further researches in new medicines or vaccines in medical sector are fundamental when epidemics break out. If the vaccines for Covid 19 was not created, milions of lives would be placed at risk. This underscores the need for government intervention in maintaining humans' existence on the earth. Additionally, interference of the authorities implies the success of human race in years to come. Governmental allocation in exploring renewable energy or transport modes would increase the efficiency and convenience in multifaceted aspects of people's lives. The advent of electric vehicles, which ameliorates the affects of the nature deterioration is a prime example.
While scientific studies aim at securing human beings' outlook, economic bodies are the main contributor to address temporary issues. The first merit of government funding in companies is that it acts as precursor to civilian's well-being and posperity. The nature of the organizations is to optimize deployment of materials and capital, creating more output for the world. As more goods are manufatured, the price of products and services are decreased as a result. This reduces the cost of living and raises people's living standards. Another benefit of government assistance for businesses is that it indirectly supplies other domains of society with necessary resources. After receiving financial allocation from gorvenments, companies will plow back the money to the economy, creating ripple effects, and achieving the growth of all aspects of life for people.
In sum, I concur with the view that government should invest equally in science and economy, as they guarantee the thorough safety and progres of humans in foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-09 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Art classes should be compulsory in high school Do you agree or disagree 74
- Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on environmental pollution and housing problems To some extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that the best way to become successful in life is to get a university education whereas others say this is no longer true Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...y for future humans future development. Further researches in new medicines or vaccines...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ture deterioration is a prime example. While scientific studies aim at securing...
^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...cientific studies aim at securing human beings outlook, economic bodies are the main c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, well, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45288753799 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04237251573 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604863221884 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0865401002 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133617603889 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380708354289 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385619849664 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880539907921 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365620841344 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.