The diagrams below give information about two road tunnels in two Australian cities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps illustrate two different underground tunnel systems for cars in two Australian cities.
Overall, there are a number of differences between the two tunnel systems, in terms of the cost, size, length, time of construction, and the surrounding environment. Both were constructed as an additional option for the existing road transport.
The first tunnel cost approximately half as much as the second tunnel to construct, because it was significantly smaller in terms of length and vehicle capacity. It, however, took much longer to construct.
The first tunnel, which took twelve years to construct between 1986 and 1998, cost $555 million and was built underneath a body of water and sand. Meanwhile, the second tunnel only took four years to complete but cost twice as much, at $1.1 billion, and was constructed beneath a layer of stone and clay.
The size of the tunnels was also substantially different, with the first tunnel being 1.5 meters high and 2.2 km long, and the second tunnel being 2.5m high and 3.6 km long. The first tunnels systems are four lanes wide, while the second tunnel system is six lanes wide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-09 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | maidiem.1508 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | susanti | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | anhalice | 67 | view |
- With deforestation urban development and illegal hunting many species are becoming endangered as they lose their habitat and some are even threatened to the point of extinction Do you thibk it is important to protect animals What measures can be taken to 73
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast food 56
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism arelated industries in one UL city between 1089 and 2009
- 2 7 2022 Nowadays people depend on technology in their free time Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think in this modern world getting old is entirely bad However others believe that the life of old people is much better now than in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99470899471 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68502749296 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2075096354 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12008070927 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560708659406 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513769256081 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0820995276071 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561980389712 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.