Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
For any country, laws are the pillars of democracy and the way in which these laws are defined goes a long way in speculating a country’s performance. The prompt argues that laws must cater to the circumstances, other factors and must not be rigid. I mostly disagree with the prompt due to the two reasons stated below. However, I do concede, in some specific situations, it makes sense to look at the bigger picture and have some flexibility while judging the person’s stance.
Firstly, laws that govern any country must be as rigid as possible irrespective of any circumstances. If the laws are firm and well-defined, there would be a fair rule for everyone and it would not favor a subsection of the society. If the laws were adaptive and flexible, it could very well be the case that people with the most power/wealth could break the law according to their needs. For example, India, during the rule of INC around 1980s, was in a pathetic state unlike today since some people unfairly exercised their power taking advantage of the flexible laws resulting in the murder of 100s of good souls who went against them. In addition, even in the present day, powerful people like Nirav Modi, Vijay Mallya laundered millions of money from public banks. Yet, they are living happily by taking advantage of the flexible laws. Therefore, it is very essential to make sure that laws are exercised fairly by making them rigid.
Secondly, in addition to powerful people taking advantage of the laws, it’s not uncommon for a common man to break the law in case they are not rigid. For example, the very existence of lawyers is to find loopholes in clauses, agreements and somehow make the law favorable to their clients. When such cases happen, people often start losing ethics which would adversely affect the country. Moreover, people are more prone to corruption since they can get away with anything in a democracy with flexible laws. But, if every act was defined for every circumstance under the law, people would think twice before committing any heinous crimes. So, it’s important for laws to be rigid that ensures that corruption is kept in check enabling smoother operation of a country.
However, in some specific circumstances, it makes sense to give a benefit of freedom and look at the broader picture. For example, if someone tries to abuse a woman, then it must be legal that she might, to some extent, take up extreme measures to protect herself. Likewise, in the case of a homicide, a person taking extreme measures to protect himself might be justified. Therefore, in some specific cases, it makes sense to view the current circumstances or the previous traits of the guilty person in question since accidents can happen.
In conclusion, a country must strive to make its laws as rigid as possible to ensure they are exercised fairly by various sections of the society. Also, depending on the case, it does make sense to look at other factors rather than literally using the law to judge a person’s stance. The above ideas when combined would give rise to a very powerful democracy, which promises a progressing country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-21 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field 50
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 50
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 50
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas trends and concepts that help explain those facts 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in question since accidents can happen. In conclusion, a country must strive to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2618.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 535.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89345794393 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60139645507 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499065420561 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 832.5 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9093911811 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.083333333 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2916666667 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54166666667 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189727242938 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572509294615 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370654585024 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109219692042 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338704043631 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.