The pie charts show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000
The four pie charts give information about the amount of electricity generated using five different sources of fuel in Australia and France between 1980 and 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that coal is the most common resource in Australia, while nuclear power was the main source in France. The total electricity production in both countries increased over that period.
In 1980, half the amount of coal was produced in Australia more than in France, while twice as much oil French spent as Australians on generating electricity. France consumed more nuclear power than Australia, at 25 units and 20 units respectively. Hydropower was used to produce electricity in France more than in Australia.
After twenty years, coal accounted for one-fourth of the total energy used to produce electricity in Australia on the chart. Natural gas, hydropower in France, and oil, natural gas in Australia had the same pattern, at only 2%. Australians did not exploit nuclear power, but it was the highest unit on France's chart. 36% was the amount of hydropower in Australia in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweighthe advantages 89
- The illustration shows information about how an igloo is built from snow Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 67
- The maps below show the layouts of the nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 78
- The bar chart gives information about the food loss and waste at different stages of production in developed and developing countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09659090909 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75341987767 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0295459858 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380991757247 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151182939432 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104041966689 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244027410727 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113379122566 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.