Some people think that there should be some strict controls on noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is sometimes argued whether residents could be allowed to make noise as much as they want or are forced to comply with the restriction policies of it. Although there is no doubt about the advantages that are given by noise, I partly agree with this notion due to the drawbacks of making it uncontrollably.
On the one hand, the option to generate noise freely to large extent without limit is attractive for several reasons. The first reason for this is people tend to find an effective way to relieve considerable stress at work or school that they suffered from, listening to rhythmic sounds becomes one of the foundational demands that can be seen as a recreational activity. It can be perfectly exemplified by the fact that after a tiring day, people come home and self-entertain by singing karaoke and holding a party which partly mitigates stressful situations and brings a certain amount of relaxation. Additionally, with the development of technology and construction engineering, scientists have applied successfully soundproofing materials to build many residential facilities and public edifices such as apartment buildings. Consequently, regulations for producing noise no longer be imposed since people have private spaces to freely generate noise.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why I also believe it is important to put noise-making under the control. This is mainly due to there are numerous potential health issues that are accompanied by high pitch noise. For example, after lengthy exposure to loud sounds in the workplace, people tend to gradually become temporarily deaf or permanently endured auditory impairments. Another reason is residents are disturbed by excessive levels of noise that interrupt them from working or studying. For instance, studies show that if a working environment is pleasant, productivity will dramatically increase. This is because, without appropriate control over making noise, concentration can not be facilitated leading to the hazard of developmental delay and retardation possibility.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons for making noise freely as it’s convenience of entertainment and steps need to be taken to regulate noise producing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-16 | mbn250 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Lee Daisy | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Lee Daisy | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | harry@uppal | 84 | view |
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls on noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls on noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 89
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is the case What can be done to attract local people 78
- The top priority of businesses is making money and they do not need to have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14033145267 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608571428571 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3617100986 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195373230095 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658090895892 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063974117307 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129690544516 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275470459513 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14033145267 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608571428571 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3617100986 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195373230095 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658090895892 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063974117307 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129690544516 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275470459513 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.