The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present.Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
This report will refer to two maps that show how a seaside village changed over the years between 1995 and present.
Over the period, the area was totally redeveloped, particularly on the farmland and forest park. It has been changed to suit people's entertainment needs.
In 1995, the seaside village consisted mostly of farmland and a forest park with just a few houses. In the south, there was a fishing port and a fish market were a few shops.
And now has had a change in the appearance of more houses. The east has undergone a great change by replacing farmland and forest park with golf and tennis courses. The hotel now has car parking. In the past, there was a fish market and shops but now those structures have been converted into restaurants and apartments. The fishing port has been demolished and the road is open to meet the needs of the population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-25 | Tran Le Bao Ngoc | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-20 | Nguyễn Quỳnh Nga | view | |
| 2022-12-20 | Stockhom | view | |
| 2022-12-20 | Hoan Chau | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | snowacealex | view |
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve 73
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 61
- the maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of the town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 56
- the maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of the town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 56
- the maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of the town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 719.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66883116883 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51647464285 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1689545422 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.9 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104170799977 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388542331237 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871621667052 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883585561242 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115790999908 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.