Task 2. Environmental damage is a problem in most countries. What are the major causes of environmental damage? Who are responsible for preventing environmental damage?
It is obvious that environmental degradation has become a worldwide catastrophe. This phenomenon can be attributed to several factors and different measures should be imposed by the government to tackle the ecological crisis.
There are many causes that have contributed to environmental damage across the globe. Firstly, the growing demands for consumer products and energy have led to excessive mineral extraction. Moreover, due to the development of industry, more available spaces are required for the construction of high-rise buildings and factories, which has resulted in the haphazard exploitation of lowland tropical rainforests. Deforestation has taken place in many parts of the world, significantly depleting available habitats for many species. Many creatures are now on the brink of extinction due to this problem. Secondly, degradation in natural resources has also gone hand-in-hand with contamination. Particularly, the burning and dumping of non-biodegradable chemicals into the surrounding environment, especially water reservoirs, has reduced the accessibility of hygienic water sources, which not only damages aquatic organisms but also caused numerous degenerative diseases for human beings.
Therefore, national and local authorities should hold accountable for the conservation of the environment. Specifically, the government should impose an official ban on all activities that jeopardize natural sources and allocate resources for conservation campaigns for tree planting or construction of reserves such as national parks to protect endangered species. Furthermore, individuals can also organize pressure groups to campaign for the government to immediately take action and expand financial provision for more environmentally-friendly activities.
In conclusion, environmental damage can result from several activities of humans. Thus, several policies and campaigns must be implemented to protect our natural world from degradation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-01 | uyenmia | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Vivi_peach | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Vivi_peach | 61 | view |
- Task 2 Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- Task 2 It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- More and more people today are choosing to eat only healthy food and are making time to exercise regularly Why is this What can be done to encourage other people to eat only healthy food and to make time to exercise regularly 67
- Task 1 The maps show a beautiful beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ect our natural world from degradation.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.25830258303 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5554726271 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642066420664 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2012050016 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243689915944 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891325698559 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094884029586 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130617820008 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463927795116 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.35 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.03 12.4159519038 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.