The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The given illustration depicts information regarding the mass of fish and various categories of meat that a person consumed on average per week in a European nation from 1979 to 2004. Overall, there was a downward trend in the figure for beef and lamb, while the reverse trend was seen in the figure for chicken. Additionally, fish was the meat consumed the least by dwellers in that country throughout the interval examined.
Regarding the consumption of chicken, the figure for this meat was approximately 140 grams in 1979. Afterward, it experienced noticeable increases to surpass beef and became the most popular kind of meat in 2004.
Concerning movements of beef, about 210 grams were digested in 1979. After witnessing a mild rise, it reached its pinnacle in the 1979-1984 period. Subsequently, beef underwent erratic behaviors followed by sinking a trough of 100 grams before making a slight recovery at the end of the interval.
In view of lamb, the amount of this food consumed was recorded at precisely 150 grams per person in 1979. Following that it moved in parallel with the declines in beef digestion, culminating at approximately 65 grams in 2004.
Over the interval, the consumption of fish witnessed insignificant movements, retaining the position as the meat consumed most negligibly throughout the given period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 78
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age group who went to the cinema once a month in Great Britain Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untry throughout the interval examined. Regarding the consumption of chicken, th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, well, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24537037037 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9344366086 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2970601537 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197617240184 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783208964012 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590446191956 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11113844848 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579816684245 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.