The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today
Given are the two maps delineating the modifications of a seafront zone after a course of time, commencing from 1950 until now.
Perceptibly, the region has experienced moderate transformations with the elimination of the playground along with the addition of myriad amenities.
In 1950, the road went from west to east reaching the car park in the north of the map; however, it has been extended all the way to the lighthouse in the southeast. Furthermore, the playground in the west has been replaced by the new car park while the nearby dining tables and the pavilion have remained.
In the past, there were two swimming pools with 25m in length in the west and the east; nevertheless, after years of development, only the pool on the left has been expanded double in size. Additionally, the two surf clubs have been constructed adjacent to each pool while the restaurant has been newly added to the furthest west.
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 78
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 67
- The price of 800 grams of four kinds of bread in a particular European country 78
- Some people think that childcare centers provide the best services for children of preschool age Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their kids Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The map below shows a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and now 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating the modificati...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90445859873 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88898268289 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592356687898 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.2710795634 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0595218046389 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324729951621 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460045692233 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0406461167012 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432368250182 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.