In human life, taking risks is inevitable because it is believed to be a barrier that needs to be overcome in order to achieve desired outcomes. Hence, it is crucial for people to gamble not only in their professional aspects but also in their private lives. In my opinion, everything has its own pros and cons, and taking risks is no exception.
On the one hand, being willing to take risks will pave the way for many opportunities that can unleash an individual’s whole potential or change their lives positively. For instance, an excellent accountant will never get a higher position in the organization if he is afraid to gamble for the better. In addition, if he has the gut to take risks, a new horizon will be widely opened in terms of higher position chances. This is also appropriate for an individual’s personal life, a person won’t know how lucky he is when playing a lottery. Hence, he could become a wealthy person immediately or stay in poverty.
On the other hand, there are some drawbacks when taking risks the wrong way. To make it more clear, taking risks could bring people 50 percent of success and failure, if fortune is not likely to happen, they are going to endure consequences that cannot be resolved easily. For example, job hopping is good for employees who are eagle to earn professional experience or a better-paid job, however, if the new organization they are going to work in is not as good as the previous one, they will regret it for the rest of their lives. In terms of personal lives, marriage is a huge gamble that everyone has to undergo in their lifetimes, many people admit that they feel a sense of remorse after having married a partner because they have to sacrifice many things such as their salaries, taking care of children or even losing chances for a greater job.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that being willing to take risks could strengthen a person's experiences and create precious opportunities in many contexts of life. However, it also means he will need to pay a price that may be unpleasant or sometimes regretful.
- These days mobile phones and the internet are very important to the ways in which people relate to one another socially Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Over reliance on modern technology means that people are failing to learn or are forgetting many basic to skills To what extent is this true Are people becoming so reliant on modern technology that they are no longer able to do some things without it 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...mple, job hopping is good for employees who are eagle to earn professional experience o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75274725275 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71153706982 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.9071995822 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.571428571 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306355856336 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107434935944 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614580573331 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189631615497 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639931595339 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.