The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.
The bar charts elucidate the number of imprisonment over 50 years in 5 different countries; Great Britain, Australia, New Zealand, US and Canada.
The US had the highest number pf prisoners in four out of the six years shown on the chart, and in 1980 the figure for this country peaked at nearly 140,000 prisoners. Canada had the highest figures for imprisonment in 1930 and 1950, with about 120,000 prisoners in both years.
The figures for New Zealand and Australia fluctuated between 40,000 and 100,000 prisoners, although New Zealand’s prison population tended to be the higher of the two.
In contrast to the figures for the other countries, the number of prisoners in Great Britain rose steadily between 1930 and 1980, reaching a peak of about 80,000 at the end of the period.
While the figures for imprisonment fluctuated over the period shown, it is clear that the US had the highest number of prisoners overall. Great Britain, on the other hand, had the lowest number of prisoners for the majority of the period.
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010. 60
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- How people invested money in stocks and bonds in Some country from 2001 to 2006. 70
- Some people feel certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more. Especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the wor 80
- The bar chart shows the number of overseas students enrolled in a third year Computer Science course at a Canadian college.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 82 100
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 174 200
No. of Characters: 826 1000
No. of Different Words: 82 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.632 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.747 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.497 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 64 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 25 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.817 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.548 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.884 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.258 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4