Given are the 4 pie charts delineating the electricity production by different resources in Australia and France, over a course of 20 years, commencing from 1980.
Perceptibly, nuclear energy good was escalating in France, while it was absent in Australia through the time.
Overally, in 1980, the sum of produced electricity of Australia was registered at 100, which is 10 more than those of France. However, in 2000, the situation was reversed when France's surpassed Australia's with 180 and 170.
Specifically, Australia majority focused on manufacturing coal energy with 50 units, before soaring to 130 in 2000. In the second place, there was an equal statistic recorded at 20 units by hydropower and natural gas. As time went on, whereas hydropower product escalated to 36, a great diminution was true with natural gas by minimizing it to 2 units, which was also the consequence of oil electricity from 10 units.
On the other hand, in France, a remarkable depression was happended to natural gas and hydroenergy during the figured period when they both shrank to 2 units. Nevertheless, while nuclear energy experienced a great leap to 126, oil energy was soared from 20 to 25. Out of the fluctuation, coal-based energy remained its position at 25 overtime.
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 78
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 56
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the informat 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the 4 pie charts delineating the electr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, whereas, while, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11594202899 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98851528341 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.019423182 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114669821821 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526061675675 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543872305478 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804435435786 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658413506932 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the 4 pie charts delineating the electr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, whereas, while, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11594202899 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98851528341 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.019423182 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114669821821 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526061675675 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543872305478 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804435435786 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658413506932 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.