The layouts illustrate the proposed innovations to an office building.
Overall, it can be seen that the office building will be dramatically enlarged, with the two grass areas being cut down to make way for upgraded facilities with an outdoor seating area, a coffee machine, meeting areas and a set of chairs. Additionally, changes are planned for both the front and back of the building.
Moving to the exterior of the building, the left side grass area is planned to be knocked down to give way to with an outdoor seating area, a coffee machine, meeting spaces, and a set of furniture at the bottom. Meanwhile, an extra coffee machine, an upgraded meeting area, and a set of seating at the bottom right of the building will be constructed to replace the right-side lawn.
Looking inside the building, two new offices will be built by demolishing the kitchen and canteen currently located at the rear of the building. The storeroom next to these rooms will remain in place, while the adjacent WCs will be relocated to the top-right corner of the building. The small four offices at the front of the building currently to the left of the entrance will be renovated into two big offices, one on either side of it.
- Some people believe that schools are no longer necessary because students can get so much information through the Internet and study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 78
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from 5 organizations Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
- The charts give information about world forests in five different regions 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75943396226 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60392312259 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4034408379 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.125 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0875608332617 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04895720206 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299426354903 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689553199523 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230190388775 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.