Some people say that the best way to discourage smoking is to make smoking illegal in public places. Other people say that this is not enough and that other measures are needed. Discuss both these views, and give your opinion.
In the modern developing society, smoking could be a currently global concern for most of the country those who disire to protect the whole health, and prevent the upcoming diseases. While many a person argues that smoking should be prohibited in public places, some others suggest enforcing essential measures. I strongly agree with both sides of the view and I would like to elaborate on it in details with the below explanation-essay.
On the first edge of thinking, smoking ban in public places helps to build a better healthy lifestyle for smokers and avoid bad impacts to other people surrounded and even the non-smokers. For more details, illegal smoking in companies, restaurants, or parks can help to decrease the time of smoking of a single individual. As a result, the smokers do not have a lot of time for lighting a cigarette leading to easily to reduce bad habit of smoking. Moreover, the limitation of the places for smoking also prevents other people from hamful effects of smoke; therefore, save people from smoke-related diseases.
On the other hand, governments ought to consider social-learning classes about the damage of smoking; especially, initial lessons for students from when they were a child. In particular, the national education programmes should include several periods for pros and cons of smoking and guide them all the clear mindset about cigarettes. Furthermore, the national television channels should air some anti-smoking shows to consolidate people’s awareness about harmfulness of smoking. To my certain experience and views, I totally consult that non-smoking regulations could be considered as “a must” for the fresher and brighter green-living environment.
In brief, smoking is the unhealthy reaction what should be prohibited on public places and applied extra regulations for anti-smoking. In fact, all of these measures will help decrease smokers and create a balance living atmosphere for human beings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-06 | Luisjackiet | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | Luisjackiet | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | deolkuljeet1991 | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-12 | hnhung | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | thevipershubham@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- Social and modern trends are difficult to follow these days and it s widely believed that they primarily exist just to make the living more colorful especially online Some people believe that we shouldn t follow them and that we should live in what we are 78
- Many people think there is a general increase in anti social behavior and a leck of respect for others What do you think are the causes of this and how to improve it What solutions can you suggest 73
- The treat of nuclear power weapons maintains world peace Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 56
- The issue of gay marriage remains controversial Some people think that this trend has adverse effects on the society while others believe that it is seen as a natural trend and right for people to choose this type of marriage Should gay marriage be legal 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in brief, in fact, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41368078176 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99587510456 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612377850163 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.6009728011 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 127.846153846 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244381494152 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889965996918 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689392829307 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144067658614 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572556512795 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in brief, in fact, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41368078176 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99587510456 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612377850163 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.6009728011 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 127.846153846 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244381494152 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889965996918 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689392829307 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144067658614 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572556512795 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.