The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015

The given line chart gives information about the proportion of citizens in five different age categories in a city who took part in music concerts from 2010 to 2015.
It is evident that people aged 16 to 54 had a tendency to go to music concerts over the period of 5 years. However, although the percentage of people over 75 increased gradually during the same period, this figure accounted for the lowest proportion among 5 age groups. In contrast, the figure for people aged 55-64 decreased slightly.
In 2010, the highest proportion of residents participating in music concerts was from 25 to 44, at over 50%, followed by people aged 16-24 and 45-54, at 40%. However, in the following years, the percentage of people in a city going to music concerts who were from 16 to 24 years old went up significantly to approximately 65%, which was higher than the figure for people in group 25-44 ( 50%) and 45-54 (below 50%).

In contrast to the four age categories, there was a slow decline to around 21% in the group 55-64 between 2010 and 2015. Additionally, despite growing steadily during the 5-year period, the proportion of citizens over 75 still had the lowest percentage among the five age groups.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing in music concerts was from 25 to 44, at over 50%, followed by people aged 16-...
^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han the figure for people in group 25-44 50% and 45-54 below 50%. In contrast...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77403846154 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66968084628 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4123951494 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.125 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335909784214 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151177280222 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670597388378 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207502568163 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435534295195 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.