Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others. What types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, opinions differ as to whether it is much better for certain dilapidated buildings to be preserved more than others. From my perspective, there are some kinds of run-down buildings needing to be maintained and this tendency may bring more benefits, compared to the drawbacks.
On the one hand, it is thought that the authorities need to subsidise money for the preservation of some types of old building. The first one that needs to be taken into account is historical buildings since they are the symbols of the past. For instance, in Ho Chi Minh city, the local government has spared money for the maintenance of Duc Ba church, which was built during the time Vietnam was governed by French. As a result, this church can exist with the time and next generations could have a look into the history and development of this city. Furthermore, governments ought to pay attention to the refurbishment of authority buildings since they play such a fundamental role in leading a specific region. To illustrate, the buildings of Vietnamese communist party or national assembly are usually redecorated and renovated by the government. Without the preservation of these buildings, there would be no place for authority officials to lead and work.
On the other hand, it is believed that this trend may be unfavorable in some facets. Some experts opine that instead of spending too much money maintaining old infrastructures, officials in charge should allocate this money to tackle national problems and make investment to crucial fields like education or health care. It can lead to the enhancement in the living standard of a country. However, the pros this tendency could bring about might offset the cons. The most important advantage needing to be mentioned is that if run-down buildings, especially those erected in the past, are well-preserved, these infrastructures can become the tourist attractions and the images of a nation. For example, owning to the desire to visit historical places such as Ho Chi Minh mausoleum or Hoan Kiem lake ,international tourists consider Vietnam to be one of the best destinations. Thus, Vietnamese tourism can thrive strongly.
In conclusion, it is imperative for some essential buildings which are in poor condition to be refurbished. Apparently, with persuasive justifications, I have to admit that this trend may be more auspicious rather than be detrimental.
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability Others believe that there are more important factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- 1 Technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Nowadays, opinions differ as to whether it is much better for certain dilapidat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 797, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Ho Chi Minh mausoleum or Hoan Kiem lake ,international tourists consider Vietnam ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20822622108 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08689947917 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555269922879 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9046312703 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280270364565 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828518019076 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726349507071 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182219902996 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530763836653 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.