The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph given illustrates how many hours each teacher in four distinct nations spared for education in 2001.
It is clear from the graph that during the research period, upper secondary teachers were prone to spend more hours for teaching, compared to others. Additionally, all the figures for the USA were highest.
When it comes to how much hours spent by primary teachers , the number of the USA was highest, at around 800 hours, compared to 600 hours spent by Irish, Spanish and Japanese teachers. At the same time, American lower secondary teacher spent over 1000 hours teaching, whereas the figure for Ireland was insignificantly lower, at exactly 800 hours. By contrast, there were 600 hours spared by Spanish and Japanese teachers.
In terms of Upper secondary teachers, the quantity of the USA stood at approximately 1500 hours, which made it become the peak of the graph. In contrast, teachers in Spain and Ireland spared less hours than those in the USA, at nearly 1000 hours and 800 hours in turn, while the figure for Japan was nearly two times as low as that of the USA, at over 600 hours.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e graph that during the research period, upper secondary teachers were prone to s...
^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...USA were highest. When it comes to how much hours spent by primary teachers , the n...
^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...how much hours spent by primary teachers , the number of the USA was highest, at a...
^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
...t, teachers in Spain and Ireland spared less hours than those in the USA, at nearly 1000 h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...t, teachers in Spain and Ireland spared less hours than those in the USA, at nearly ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81151832461 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40495884371 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8290459106 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11871903865 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063338298431 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053636577461 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966551167475 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544602581241 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.