The diagrams depict the difference of a small local museum's layout between 1957 and 2007. In general, it is clearly apparent that the museum was wider and several rooms was added. Additionally, trees were felled and replaced by other facilities.
Looking more in details on the layouts, in 1957, the museum only consisted of three parts with small footpath linked the entrance hall to the main road. In the next five decades, some rooms were functionated differently, additional rooms were added and some facilities were removed and replaced by new car park. The parts that used to be local history room was replaced with the reception while those that functioned as museum store was changed to cafe. In addition, the main room that used to be used for national history exhibition was changed to local history room.
Furthermore, the museum was expanded through the additional three rooms notably special exhibitions room and education center at the upside of the main room and museum shop next to the reception. Finally, the footpath and the entrance hall were removed. As a replacement, the car park was built in the front part of the museum.
- The diagram below shows process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Brick manufacturing 78
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 67
- Doing volunteer work is a waste of time and shouldn t be encouraged among students Do you agree or disagree with this idea 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- Nowadays sending children to boarding school is becoming increasingly popular why is it is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'museums'' or 'museum's'?
Suggestion: museums'; museum's
... depict the difference of a small local museums layout between 1957 and 2007. In genera...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion was changed to local history room. Furthermore, the museum was expanded thr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'exhibitions'' or 'exhibition's'?
Suggestion: exhibitions'; exhibition's
... additional three rooms notably special exhibitions room and education center at the upside...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, look, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99479166667 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55214179355 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536458333333 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8703772493 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147290017391 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730052144847 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904030037433 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121861613871 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491426674898 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.