The maps below show the layouts of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013.
The maps compare the layout of a Nature museum before and after renovations from 2010 to 2013.
Overall, it is apparent that the size of the museum had significantly expanded with the garden to the left of the central building being demolished to make room for new indoor facilities. Another noticeable feature is that much of the original museum such as the lobby and dinosaurs exhibit stayed unchanged.
The lobby in the bottom of the central building comprising of the entrance and a ticket booth was untouched, and above that was the Ocean Hall which was enlarged. Turning to the room to the left of the Ocean Hall, it can be observed that an Ice age display had been erected, replacing the mammals one. Furthermore, a little Insect exhibit had been added in the bottom left of the room.
To the right side of the central buidling, a new building had been constructed in place of the old garden. The mammals exhibit originally located in the left building was relocated here with the addition of a Human Ongins display right beneath it. In addition, a shop and a cafe was added adjacent to the mammals display in order to service visitors.
- Nowadays it is as important to teach students soft skills as it is to teach them subject knowledge To what extent do you agree disagree with this opinion 89
- Task 1 The bar chart shows the proportion of people aged over 65 years old in Germany Canada and the UK over a period of 50 years 84
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Could this trend have more positive or negative effects on society 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the depth of snow cm in a particular ski resort in Canada in three individual years 78
- An airport map s redevelopment in the next year 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...y in the bottom of the central building comprising of the entrance and a ticket booth was unt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74626865672 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54118327465 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0443365694 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106153742244 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585011183667 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134779963228 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124345654095 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181689930964 0.0819641961636 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...y in the bottom of the central building comprising of the entrance and a ticket booth was unt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74626865672 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54118327465 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0443365694 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106153742244 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585011183667 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134779963228 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124345654095 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181689930964 0.0819641961636 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.