The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade- labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

The tables illustrate the quantity of money earned from selling two items that were coffee and bananas in two years 1999 and 2004 in five European nations.
Overall, we can see that almost two kinds of production in all these countries were also increased except coffee in Sweden and bananas in Sweden and Denmark. The UK is a nation that takes the lead in sales with the highest position.
About coffee, Switzerland had the largest amount that achieved 3 million in 1999, but until 2004, the UK moved into the lead with 20 million. The remaining nations following in a close third, fourth and fifth respectively, including Belgium, Sweden and Denmark, rose slightly from 0.2 to 0.3 before 2 years.
While bananas, Switzerland was in the top flight in both two years and grew 3 times compared to 1999 from 15 to 47 million. There was an upward trend in the UK and Belgium that increased about 4.5 and 3.4 respectively. In contradiction with 3 countries, Sweden and Denmark fell slightly about one million in the period of time.
As can be seen the table, Switzerland and the UK were the two countries that lead in both coffee and bananas. Besides, the other countries were following behind.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-01 trpg143 56 view
2023-11-16 phamquanghmu 73 view
2023-11-11 Daniel3003 67 view
2023-11-11 Daniel3003 67 view
2023-11-11 Daniel3003 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... fell slightly about one million in the period of time. As can be seen the table, Switzerlan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other countries were following behind.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78260869565 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5408607403 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570048309179 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8247121412 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195961080517 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736860753222 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644790610367 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115068710316 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687605411128 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.