Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Regardly to the country you live in, you may or may not easily use the train instead of using a personal car. I can only talk about my own experience in France where the railway network is quite developped and practical.
Travelling by train is, in my opinion, more economic on the long term than having a car which needs fuel, insurance and regular controls. It is also more ecological as are public transportations in general. At last, it is also practical because the train is most of the time faster than a car and because there is no traffic jams on the railroads. In addition to that, I personally think that a train trip is more enjoyable because you can rest or read – impossible things when you drive.
For all these reasons, I prefer travelling by train than by car so I agree with the idea that governments should invest in railways rather than roads. A government is supposed to take care of its citizens and to maintain a suitable economic level. I think travelling by train is really safer than travelling by car and that’s one of the reasons why governments should encourage people to use trains.
Furthermore, governments are more and more concerned about global warming and their actions can influence the future events. Investing in railways is a way of promoting train trips and it can be part of the solution to reduce the human activities impact on the climate changes.
On the contrary, if governments invest in roads, that would encourage people to use their personal car, which is eco-unfriendly and not very economic. The USA don’t really look concerned about pollution problems and that may be a reason why they didn’t sign the Kyoto Protocol. Then, it is not very surprising that the american railway network isn’t very important nor efficient. The size of the country, of course, doesn’t help, but another big country, India, has a significant usage of trains. India has probably an important railway network for economical reasons.
To conclude, as well for ecological reasons as for economical ones, I think governments should invest in railways rather than roads. I for one reckon that it would be a responsible choice for future generations.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
- Some believe that money for education should mainly be spent on better computers while others believe it would be better spent on teachers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public 89
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and is it positive or negative development 61
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 92
- Each Year the Crime Rate Increases What Are the Causes of Crime and What Could Be Done to Prevent This Rise in Criminal Activity 92
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 376 350
No. of Characters: 1754 1500
No. of Different Words: 190 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.403 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.665 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.69 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.889 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.363 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.722 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.314 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.552 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.061 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5