Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Some consider it necessary for students to learn about culinary skills and the nature of food, while others argue the time at school should be spent for main subjects. Personally, although the academic subjects are of importance to a student’s academic career, students need to be equipped with sufficient nutritional knowledge to lead a healthy lifestyle.
On the on hand, it is argued that as the academic subjects account for a large proportion of a student’s GPA, most students have an urge to dedicate most of the time to review lessons or have more excercises done. Therefore, if there is an inadequate amount of time for such tasks, students will be likely in for low scores on high-stake tests such as, final-term ones. Worse still, the poor results can be an obstacle to their path to the desired university in future. Consequently, many feel reluctant to deviate from a “normal” study plan to take on other subjects.
On the other hand, some think that schools should introduce subjects on cooking and food to their curriculum, because there is a growing concern over the rates of health problems among children. This is because ready-made food with artificial sweeteners and high saturated fat content is made cheaper and tastier, which tempts young students to opt for this kind of food. As a result, the obesity trend in children is most likely upwards. However, Cooking classes can offer a nourishing option to students, as these courses enable students to prepare balanced meals, thanks to cooking skills and nutritional knowledge. More importantly, being on a healthy diet can reduce the likelihood of a student’s studies being interrupted by food-related issues, like diabetes.
In conclusion, with the increased number of overweight children in society, it is an imperative for them to be taught about cooking science at school. Otherwise, many could be prone to cardiovascular problems at middle age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
- many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 92
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 89
- Some people believe that new buildings should be built in traditional styles To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 95
- some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country An alternative vieww is that they can adapt to a new environment by establishing a minority community Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Today people are wasting large amounts of food Why What can be done to reduce the amount of food wasted 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...to their path to the desired university in future. Consequently, many feel reluctant to d...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18152866242 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86929243201 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0253339037 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26060299823 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837052554843 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679675714715 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152998455392 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691305157096 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.