Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While many governments prioritize economic progress as their primary goal, there are individuals who argue that a country's development should encompass other aspects as well. This essay will examine both perspectives and provide a personal opinion.
On one hand, governments often prioritize economic progress due to its potential to enhance a nation's prosperity and improve the standard of living for its citizens. Economic growth generates job opportunities, attracts foreign investments, and increases tax revenue, which can be allocated towards public services such as healthcare and education. Additionally, a strong economy can bolster a country's global influence and competitiveness. For instance, China's economic rise has propelled it to become one of the world's leading superpowers.
On the other hand, proponents of a broader definition of progress argue that a country's development should encompass social, environmental, and cultural factors. They contend that economic growth alone cannot guarantee overall well-being and sustainability. Social progress entails ensuring equal access to education, healthcare, and social services, fostering social cohesion, and reducing inequality. Environmental progress involves adopting sustainable practices, preserving natural resources, and mitigating climate change. Cultural progress involves the preservation of cultural heritage, fostering creativity, and promoting diversity.
In my opinion, while economic progress is undeniably important, it should not be pursued at the expense of other dimensions of development. A balanced approach is necessary, where economic growth is pursued alongside social, environmental, and cultural progress. Governments should strive to create policies that promote inclusive growth, equitable distribution of resources, and environmental sustainability. For instance, investing in renewable energy sources can contribute to both economic growth and environmental progress. By prioritizing a holistic approach to development, countries can achieve long-term prosperity that benefits all segments of society and safeguards the environment for future generations.
In conclusion, while economic progress is often seen as the primary goal for governments, it is crucial to recognize the significance of other dimensions of development. A comprehensive approach that encompasses social, environmental, and cultural progress is necessary to foster sustainable and inclusive growth. By striking a balance between economic prosperity and broader progress, countries can achieve a more equitable and resilient future.
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extend do you agree 73
- companies should provide sports facilities for local communities To what extend do you agree 73
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extend do you agree 67
- Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- companies should provide sports facilities for local communities To what extend do you agree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...examine both perspectives and provide a personal opinion. On one hand, governments often prio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...gress due to its potential to enhance a nations prosperity and improve the standard of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.42045454545 5.12529762239 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35177191945 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559659090909 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 0.809619238477 1112% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7576522504 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.947368421 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5263157895 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244284391513 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803881284328 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514827915317 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1573062365 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429723767154 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.96 12.4159519038 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.