companies should provide sports facilities for local communities. To what extend do you agree?
The provision of sports facilities by companies for local communities is a topic that sparks debate. Advocates argue that companies should take the initiative to offer such amenities, while others believe it should primarily be the responsibility of the government. This essay will explore both perspectives and present my personal viewpoint.
Those in favor of companies providing sports facilities contend that they possess the financial means and capacity to do so. Companies, with their resources, can invest in infrastructure that benefits the community. For instance, constructing a community gym or sponsoring sports teams can promote an active lifestyle and combat sedentary habits. By fostering a sense of community and camaraderie through sports activities, companies can positively impact residents' lives. A manufacturing company, for example, could allocate a portion of its profits to build a soccer field for local children, encouraging physical activity and team spirit.
However, opponents argue that the responsibility lies with the government. They assert that governments are elected to serve the needs of citizens and should allocate public funds for constructing and maintaining sports facilities. This ensures equal access for all community members, irrespective of their financial backgrounds. Government involvement also guarantees proper regulation and oversight, ensuring the safety and inclusivity of the facilities. For instance, a government can establish a public park with various sports amenities, enabling individuals from different socioeconomic backgrounds to enjoy the benefits of sports and recreation.
In my opinion, while it is commendable for companies to contribute to the community by providing sports facilities, it should not be their sole responsibility. The government should play a significant role in facilitating and supporting the development of such facilities. Collaboration between the private sector and the government can lead to more comprehensive and sustainable solutions. For example, a company can partner with the government to establish a sports complex, with the government overseeing its accessibility and maintenance.
In conclusion, while companies can make valuable contributions by providing sports facilities, the government should take the lead in this area. A collaborative effort between the private and public sectors is essential to ensure the availability of sports facilities for all members of the local community. By working together, we can create a healthier and more inclusive society where individuals have access to recreational opportunities that promote physical and mental well-being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-18 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | Sandeep USA | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-03-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of living a number of different places during your childhood years 78
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extend do you agree 73
- companies should provide sports facilities for local communities To what extend do you agree 73
- companies should provide sports facilities for local communities To what extend do you agree 73
- Some people say that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on reducing environmental population and housing problems To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2300.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98958333333 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35447397661 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520833333333 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 719.1 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4684926461 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32867202835 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104556022646 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961140241488 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203435517573 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461815515172 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2300.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98958333333 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35447397661 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520833333333 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 719.1 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4684926461 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32867202835 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104556022646 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961140241488 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203435517573 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461815515172 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.