The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The pictures below illustrate the evolution of a public park named Grange Park from 1920 to today.
Overall, the most significant changes in the park were the relocation of a rose garden and seats and the upgradation of the stage for musicians.
There was a fountain at the park centre, but it has been replaced by a garden, with four seats surrounding it, today. On the Northeast side of the park was a rose garden; however, the area is now a cafe. Next to it was a pond for plants, but now the space has been converted into a play area. Moreover, a water feature has replaced the old glasshouse next to Eldon Street, and an entrance underground car park on the Southeast has been established.
Today, the park entrances remained unchanged, next to Arnold Street and Eldon Street. In the West of the park, the amphitheatre for concerts has replaced the old stage built in 1920. There was a reduction of rose gardens now compared to 1920; thus, there is only one rose garden in the Northwest of the park.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- Modern technology has greatly influenced people s ways of entertainment making people less creative Do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia in 2018 84
- Some people think the government funding should be used for supporting art and cultures others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The diagrams show changes to a medical centre from 2008 to 2010 73
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56906077348 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57808076136 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7835070606 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187253109245 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906455383422 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065541923648 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137896760994 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743771577077 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56906077348 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57808076136 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7835070606 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187253109245 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906455383422 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065541923648 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137896760994 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743771577077 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.