As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Thinking is very important to solve problems. It is the constructive thinking which led people invent different tools and techniques to revolutionize the era. But I mostly agree with the statement that depending more on technology to solve problems will cause the thinking ability of humans to reduce.
Nowadays, students are using are using devices to solve their academic tasks. They are using their brain less rather using devices much. For that reason, For that reason, their thinking capacity to solve a simple task is now at risk of paralysis. For example, students are using device to solve simple mathematical calculations. As a result, they are facing problems in the situation where device is not allowed to use. They become weak in calculation, which will have impact on quick decision making process.
Moreover, people are thinking technology is panacea of all problems. So, they tend to use technology rather than involve the situation directly where it is crying need. For example, someone is beating a boy brutally in the street. What others will do there mostly, they will turn on the video of their mobile and will try to post it in facebook. To them posting the incident is the solution rather than helping the boy or hindering the man from beating. It is because they loss their problem solving capacity and probable solution on instant due to the dependency of technology.
However, technology is not always the criminal to cause the brain idle. It can turn as blessings while we can use technology to get valuable information before taking decision. For example, getting informed about weather before going out will assist taking proper step according to situation and make the plan effective.
So, from above it is clear that excessive use of technology is a curse as it cause the thinking process
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study under the same national curriculum 16
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study under the same national curriculum before they enter college 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'are using'.
Suggestion: are using
...humans to reduce. Nowadays, students are using are using devices to solve their academic tasks. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... process. Moreover, people are thinking technology is panacea of all problems. S...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 303.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03300330033 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61500291772 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531353135314 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5175424088 60.3974514979 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.2631578947 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9473684211 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243684507309 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767982216202 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804457743136 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137786470245 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899685480013 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.