The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000
The graph demonstrates the fuel usage rate count by tons in Europe from 1981 to 2000, divided into 3 main type include petroleum, coal and gas.
Overall, there is a difference between the 3 kinds of fuel during this period. Petroleum reaches the top of the graph during this time and is also the most commonly consumed fuel. Coal had a downtrend and natural gas went up at the end of the 20th century.
The petroleum graph line was at the top, fluctuating between 100 and nearly 135 tons during the period. The number of 132 tons reached its peak in 1983, 1987, and 1997 at approximately the same number. A steady decrease in coal production occurred except in 1985, when it fell to 45 tons, nearly half of what it was in 1984. It soon returned the next year and ended up at the bottom of the line at 40 tons in 2000. In contrast, natural gas prices remained steady for the first half of the period at around 40 tons and began to rise in 1994. It replaced coal in the second place in 1997 and peaked at over 80 tons in the end of the line which in 2000.
- Modern technology is changing our world It has advantages such as bringing people closer together through communication it also has disadvantages such as destroying the differences between cultures To what extend do you agree or disagree this statement 84
- The maps show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 73
- Many people use social media every day to keep in touch with friends and get social news Do you think the advantages of it outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 10
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, in contrast, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.22772277228 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20403245058 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.1534116219 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.4 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13274401522 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557017940023 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070936273459 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126310618565 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898794096194 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.25 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.