In today's world, it is widely perceived that food from retail stores and restaurants is being frittered away. This phenomenon could be attributed to several contributory factors, but several approaches could be adopted to tackle it.
There are numerous reasons why people throw away surplus food, one of which is promotion campaigns to lure customers. The campaign “Buy one, get one free or Two for the price one” deceives consumers into buying foods that have short shelf lives and spoil quickly. It is the food products with colorful and decorated items in the packages that attract and mislead innumerable shoppers. As a result, food items are being thrown as waste due to excessive purchasing and their shopping habits. Another justification is that consumers do not prioritize what food products they would buy and plan a grocery list when going to the food outlets, which would in turn buy products they might not consume and even jettison them.
To resolve the above-mentioned problems, some effective measures should be taken to address this situation. First and foremost, purchasers should compose a shopping list and stick to it, thereby avoiding unnecessary purchases, which slashes food waste and prevents them from wasting money. Another feasible solution is that society should launch education campaigns, which act as a deterrent to those buying in excess and disposing of food items. Furthermore, the food consumption workshops also have beneficial effects on raising the food consumers’ awareness of storing food wisely; therefore, increasing the public experience.
In sum, various actions can address the problems that are certain to arise as food from retail stores and restaurants is being tossed into the garbage.
- The chart below show family expenditure in the UK between 1980 and 2010 56
- Some say parents whose children are breaking the law should be punished in some way To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not effective Education and job training should be used instead Do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays a lot of offices employ open space designs instead of separate rooms for work Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the united kingdom sweden italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40510948905 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71791974699 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5820045317 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.416666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365078073601 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131185745474 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704905803321 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201611578629 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466734166253 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40510948905 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71791974699 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5820045317 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.416666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365078073601 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131185745474 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704905803321 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201611578629 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466734166253 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.