Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or a shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Today, there have been pressing views on whether accepting or solving bad situations like unsatisfactory job and financial instability is the best strategy. In my opinion, which strategy to use just depends on the nature of the situation.
On the one hand, some people argue that certain situations are uncontrollable and it is best to believe in the fate that good days will come. In such cases, we should look for takeaways to prevent a similar event from happening in the future. It is no use finding solutions as you will only end up stressed and tired. For instance, imagine a manager throwing a tantrum at his team member for no relevant reason. Maybe, he is having family conflicts or personal problems. Therefore, the employee should accept his bad luck rather than fight back for his right as it will make no difference.
By contrast, it is a common belief that we should give a try to a problem no matter what the possibility is. Generally, people tend to be paranoid that the situation will be even worse, so they decide to find solutions and it usually succeeds. Take an example of a person having a shortage of money. He will able to pay for his basic needs only by working overtime or looking for a part-time job. However, he would not afford electricity and groceries bills, and accommodation fees if he denied getting out of his comfort zone.
In conclusion, both arguments have their own merits. There are bad situations which we can improve while some are out of our control and accepting them is the only option. Personally, I think both approaches are valid in real life and we should apply either of them according to the circumstances.
- It is important for people to take risks in both their professional lives and personal lives Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 78
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 61
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole 84
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe people should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both views and give your own 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pends on the nature of the situation. On the one hand, some people argue that ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s right as it will make no difference. By contrast, it is a common belief that ...
^^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of them according to the circumstances.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83103448276 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72794365329 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627586206897 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9333330527 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5625 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233028710272 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633575162831 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804872467117 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127977195939 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251154253657 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.