The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe, compared to the EU average, in 2009 and 2010
The chart illustrates the proportion of fuel utilized in the transport sector in 6 European countries compared to the EU average from 2009 to 2010.
As can be seen in the graph, Slovakia, Spain witnessed the decline in fuel percentage while the opposite was true for Italy, France and Greece. It is noticeable that EU Average fuel use was higher than all countries, except Slovakia.
In 2009, Slovakia saw a peak in the figure of fuel used, standing at roughly 9%, whereas the lowest was for Greece, at over 1%. Moreover, the proportion of fuel consumed in EU average was 6%, higher than Italy, France, Australia and Spain.
Likewise, Slovakia was the most used fuel in 2010, at 6,5% compared with the European Union average of 1,5%. This figure was lower than the fuel used in Australia, which was the same as Italy at approximately 5,3%. Plus, the remaining countries were the same in 2009, with Greece decreasing at 2%, Spain at 3% and France at 4,5%.
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- The charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at leas
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 56
- The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red to the EU average from 2009 to 2010. As can be seen in the graph, Slovakia, S...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her than all countries, except Slovakia. In 2009, Slovakia saw a peak in the figu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than Italy, France, Australia and Spain. Likewise, Slovakia was the most used fue...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, moreover, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80838323353 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5552660028 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.7422848143 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.6 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262117842901 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154706981879 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915756870862 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209485197014 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145055808305 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.