The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe, compared to the EU average, in 2009 and 2010
The line graph demonstrates the information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average over a period of 2009 years starting from 2010.
Overall, the fuel used in the transport sector in Slovakia and Spain tends to decrease. In contrast, this rate tends to increase in Italy and France. Besides, the average fuel consumption rate in the EU is higher than in all countries except Slovakia.
During this period, Slovakia's use of fuel in the transport sector was highest at 8,9% in 2009, but decreased by about 6,5% in 2010. In Italy, the rate of using raw materials is lower than Slovakia at about 4.4% in 2009 but increased 0,7% in 2010. In addition, this percentage in France is also lower than the previous two nations, reaching about 3,8% and increasing at 4,2%. In contrast, in Australia the rate of material usage leveled out between 2009 and 2010. For Spain, in 2009 the rate was increased by 3,9% but decreased by exactly 3%. On top of that, this rate in Greece is the lowest in this period, it reached at 1,1% in 2009 and went up at 2% in 2010. In 2009, the EU average reached the second highest rate after Slovakia, which reached 6% in 2009 and decreased 1% the following year.
- The sports center that you regularly visit has a problem with some of its equipment Write a letter to the center manager In your letter tell them about the problem describe how it has affected you explain why it should be fixed soon 84
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 10
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hing about 3,8% and increasing at 4,2%. In contrast, in Australia the rate of mate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, second, so, in addition, in contrast, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62162162162 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44937376982 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490990990991 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6400489382 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2727272727 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367075911224 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157180653218 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15367845357 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327162373524 0.15604864568 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174964091682 0.0819641961636 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.