The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe, compared to the EU average, in 2009 and 2010
The line graph illustrates information about fuel used for transport in countries in Europe compared to the EU average for the period 2009 to 2010.
Overall, Slovakia and Spain had both decreased and the rest of the countries did the opposite. As compared to the EU average, it was very high, but Slovakia had a lower fuel use percentage than the EU average.
Slovakia has had a very high percentage of fuel use, in 2009 it was almost 9% but decreased in 2010 and only had about 6.5%. And like Slovakia, Spain had also decreased from nearly 4% to only 3% in the period from 2009 to 2010.
In contrast, Italy, France and Germany all had a percentage increase in fuel use between 2009 and 2010. The most visible was Greece with its fuel percentage rising from a little over 1% in 2009 but upped to 2% in 2010. In addition, the Italian had also increased but it is quite small, only from 4.5% to slightly more than 5%. France was only from nearly 4% to more than 4%.
- the maps show changes that took place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 61
- the maps show changes that took place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 78
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that mental strength is the most important factor for success in sports However some others believe that it is more important to have strong and fit people Discuss both views and give your opinions 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43575418994 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33705253473 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491620111732 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3498971191 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.2222222222 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286482253352 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132954731023 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140391419116 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222689549677 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153081354784 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.