Passage believes dinosaurs are endotherms professor disagrees
Endotherms are defined as species that keep their body temperature constant. Humen are a valid example of endotherms, since they keep their baody temperature at exactly 37 degrees no matter the weather. There are many discussions about whether dinosours were endotherm or not. The passage gives reasons why they should be considered as endotherms. However the professor disagrees with the statement altogether which will be explained in the following.
First reason being, dinosaurs’ fossils were discovered in polar area which can mean they could leave in very low temperature areas without a problem. The lecturer on the other hand believes that is not right because the weather was warmer in the polar region back when dinosaurs existed, and even if it was cold they could migrate or even hibernate.
Second, The passage argues that there is connection between them being endotherms and the position and movement of thei legs. Teacher disagrees that their body structure is the way it is only for that reason. This type of bone structure is good for more weight which helped dinosuars with the way the lived.
Thirdly, reason given is their bone structure. The letter believes that haversion canals in their bone structure helped blood vessels and nerves allowed them to grow. Professor states that their bones had also had growth rings which stopes bone growth when weather gets cooler.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-04 | ayumiyazaki | 75 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | ayumiyazaki | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | cringelord | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 83 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Shaya | 78 | view |
- professor disagrees with the passage that says traditional encyclopedias are better than the communal online ones 80
- Passage believes dinosaurs are endotherms professor disagrees 83
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 70
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 70
- why does the professor disagree with teamwork 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...hey should be considered as endotherms. However the professor disagrees with the statem...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, thirdly, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22123893805 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4736531651 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637168141593 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3455173159 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7692307692 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212868963807 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633040176025 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04445435141 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10558261746 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360155976901 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.