The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates how many shops are closed and opened in a country over a period of seven years from 2011 to 2018.
Overall, it can clearly be seen that the total number of closures and openings fluctuate. Moreover, while the shops that are opened was highest at the start, it had been overtaken by the number of closed shops by the end of the period.
In terms of the number of opened markets at the beginning, it stood at around 8500 in 2011. The openings then dropped significantly to just below 4000 in 2012 before rising moderately by around 2200 two years later. Moreover, it experienced a moderate decrease to exactly 4000 in 2015 and remained at the same level in 2016. From this point onward, it climbed slightly to just above 4000 a year later and fell at exactly 3000 in the final year.
Regarding how many shops that are closed at the start, it began at around 6500. The closures witnessed a moderate decrease to about 6000 in 2012. It rose moderately by around 1000 in 2013 before falling sharply to just below 1000 in 2015. The figure of shops that are closed then increased dramatically to just above 5000 in 2016 and slightly declined in 2017 to exactly 5000. Thereafter, it experienced a slight increase to about 5100 in 2018.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | tran quynh | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | dodi1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | dodi1234 | 73 | view |
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar canes Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61504424779 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40908378957 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504424778761 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9811630481 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9166666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201269243972 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772566370261 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741875197483 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152271812639 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730377528813 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.