In response to the drastic increase in the severity of climate change governments are allocating national budget for wildlife conservation. However, many believe that other problems such as emissions from industrial activities are much greater concerns and, therefore, deserve more financial support. From my perspective, I partly agree with his opinion.
On the one hand, I believe that protecting wildlife species plays a pivotal role in preserving biodiversity, as well as the existence of human beings. One justification for this viewpoint lies in the importance of every creature in the food chain. The food chain is undeniably a complex system comprised of every single creature existing on Earth, and every species is inextricably intertwined with each other. Therefore, the disappearance or reduction in the number of any species can have deleterious effects on a large scale, leading to the disorder of the whole system, and the imbalance of the ecosystem. For example, in ancient times, the extinction of megalodon sharks was attributed to the decrease in the number of their preys which are baleen whales. Much archaeological evidence has indicated that the shift in the food- chain was the primary factor in megalodon’s demise.
On the other hand, I would argue that there are greater environmental concerns that need financially supporting. One of the most devastating problems is the mission of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere due to industrial activities such as burning coal and exploiting natural gas. Emissions from these activities can cause several repercussions on the atmosphere, as well as the degradation of the ozone layer. As more greenhouse gases accumulate in the atmosphere, more heat from solar activity’s radiation is trapped, consequently leading to global warming, and causing the Earth to be hostile and uninhabitable for numerous species. For example, the polar ice melting phenomenon resulting from global warming has catastrophically threatened the existence of polar bears and penguins as their habitats are gradually obliterated.
In conclusion, while many emphasize the need to protect wildlife species, I believe that other problems such as greenhouse gases emission is a much more alarming problem. Moreover, I reckon that the investment of governments in reducing the number of emissions can significantly mitigate other current environmental issues.
- Some think that people are responsible for their happiness Others feel that happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Some people think that people are responsible for their happiness Others feel that happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5956284153 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16681635879 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2645548218 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165362737113 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518558522792 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610679689691 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119151867632 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748797743014 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.