The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree
with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in
which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and
explain how these examples shape your position.
Teaching is an art and one’s way of teaching purely depends on how he shapes the future of the person learning from him. It is often said that a great teacher is one that helps an average student reach the top rather than already helping an excellent student be there. The statement mentioned above claims that the best way to teach is praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. In my opinion, this is not true and I will support my opinion by stating three examples.
Firstly, I think that the receiving negative feedback is the most essential in the curve of learning. It is often said that failure is the stepping stone of success. This does not mean to demotivate someone in pursuing something, rather it is a constructive feedback that will help a person get better at something. For instance, lets consider an example that of Virat Kohli, who in 2012 was a popular young cricketer who had already achieved some great feats for Indian Cricket, but at the time went through a very lean patch and was unable to even keep his in the team. At that time rather than focusing on what positive things he had already done, he got constructive feedbacks though might feel negative, but were very important for him to improve. He worked on the feedback given and now we all know how great a cricketer he is.
Secondly, another negative effect of giving only positive feedbacks is that one will not know is he or she is going on the right path or not. Giving only positive feedbacks will make them feel that they are always on the right path and success is now an easy thing for them to achieve. And when they fail at it, they are shocked. So it is very much important for one to receive negative feedback, because that comes in as a reality check and will rather make them more focused on the goal they are trying to achieve.
Thirdly, negative feedbacks act as a source of motivation for someone. If you tell someone that they are not sufficiently doing what they should, it might motivate them to work harder and not give a chance for complacency in future. So in this case, though people will not like negative feedback but they will take it as source of motivation and prove it to the world that they are capable. Many startups if would have not received this negative response, would not have been where they are right now. Apple, Amazon, all these startups received negative response and it only helped them achieve more.
So in conclusion, negative feedbacks always work as constructive ones if interpreted and worked upon in the right direction. Also, negative opinions are much more important than the positive ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...r and not give a chance for complacency in future. So in this case, though people will no...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more important than the positive ones.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66167023555 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39988857501 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488222698073 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3592470997 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2380952381 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145509233282 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484880812571 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550858489819 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872085661388 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329705159004 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.