The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002
The chart presented data about whole minutes of telephone calls in billions from citizens in the UK. The statistics separated into three groups, from 1995-2002.
From 1995 to 1999, regional line increased gradually and was the most number of minutes at that time. The local fixed line peaked at 90 billions minutes in 1999, as know as almost double national line and mobiles. From 2000 to 2002, neighborhood line went down slightly, despites this line was still at the top of the call minutes.
global group was the second place about number of minutes from 1995 to 2002. this group growth rised fast, from 38 billions minutes to 60 minutes. national and international fixed line reached the highest point of 60 billions minutes in 2001 and 2002.
telephone calls from mobiles was the lowest of the call minutes, thought it was increased by the time. mobiles calls hit a low of billions minutes calls (3 billions minutes) in 1995. From 1996 to the end, this categories grew gradually and peaked at 45 billions minutes in 2002.
The chart had many disparities between three classes. The local line was the highest number of minutes, despite it declined minimally. global line was the second place and mobiles was the last, both two groups grew steadily every years.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 67
- the chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephones calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Global
...l at the top of the call minutes. global group was the second place about number...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ut number of minutes from 1995 to 2002. this group growth rised fast, from 38 billio...
^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: National
...from 38 billions minutes to 60 minutes. national and international fixed line reached th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Telephone
...illions minutes in 2001 and 2002. telephone calls from mobiles was the lowest of th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Mobiles
..., thought it was increased by the time. mobiles calls hit a low of billions minutes cal...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 204, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... minutes in 1995. From 1996 to the end, this categories grew gradually and peaked at...
^^^^
Line 13, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Global
...minutes, despite it declined minimally. global line was the second place and mobiles w...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96744186047 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34126802511 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479069767442 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.0805221766 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.2857142857 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3571428571 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 5.23603664747 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374433474004 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155989594504 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956506278521 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248839966107 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139757451052 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.