The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph illustrates the data of visits to a specific Caribbean island in 7 years changing from 2010 to 2017.Overall, during the period, it is apparent that all the data increased. Furthermore, the number of visitors who chose staying on cruise ship rose more significantly than the one who stayed on island.
From 2010 to 2013, the total number of visits to Caribbean island stood at 1 millions, which was the highest number, followed by the figure for tourists staying on island at nearly 0,75 millions. Meanwhile, the equivalent figures for visitors who stayed on cruise ships had the lowest number ( approximately 0,25 millions). Over the first 3 years, the total data an increased. Moreover, the total visits to Caribbean island witnessed a significant increase, in 2013, its data reach 2 millions, which was exactly 2 times double than its data in 2010. The figure for tourists who stayed on island rose considerably, from 0,75 to 1,5 millions, almost 2 time higher. By contrast, the number of visitors who stayed on cruise ship rose slightly, reaching 0,5 millions in 2013, which was 0,5 millions higher.
In the next 4 year, between 2013 and 2017, the data ranking remained unchanged compared to the first year. The total data of Caribbean continued increasing considerably, reaching 3.5 millions at the end of the period, 3.5 times higher than its initial number and became the highest. After 3 year slowly growing, the number of visitors who stayed on cruise ships started rising significantly. In 2017, its number reached 2 millions, which was 8 times higher than its data in 2010 and hold the second highest. By contrast, despite some fluctuations, the figure for visitors staying on island remained unchanged in 2017 compared to its number in 2013.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-08 RIYA MODI 78 view
2023-10-04 dhphuc7866 67 view
2023-08-28 rumpul4skin view
2023-08-15 nguyenanh9182 78 view
2023-08-04 NgoMinhTriet 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...d in 7 years changing from 2010 to 2017.Overall, during the period, it is apparent that...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to stay'.
Suggestion: to stay
...rmore, the number of visitors who chose staying on cruise ship rose more significantly ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed on cruise ships had the lowest number approximately 0,25 millions. Over the fi...
^^
Line 2, column 645, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rably, from 0,75 to 1,5 millions, almost 2 time higher. By contrast, the number o...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 965.302439024 153% => OK
No of words: 295.0 196.424390244 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01694915254 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7090536281 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447457627119 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5888661626 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.846153846 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158623668231 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698072100035 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487989372197 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130047581099 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142797101667 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.