Some people think young people should be free to choose his or her job, but other people think they should be realistic and think more about their future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People’s attitude towards opting for employment is different, with one school of thought holding that youngsters have the autonomy to pursue their desired career, while others are adamant that they should think in a more practical way by considering the prospect of the occupation. This essay will first closely scrutinize both views before showing my final thought.
On the one hand, advocates of pursuing a dream job often cite the motivation and possibilities for progress that it offers fresh job-seekers. The key rationale in favor of this belief is that when individuals engage in an occupation that fits their own interest, this encourages them to improve their skills, opening the gate of extraordinary chances for them in their career path. Nonetheless, this thinking fails to factor in the extremely limited job potential as there are numerous lines of work with more supply than demand. That being the case, the income would be low, seriously, the risk of unemployment may occur. It is, therefore, safe to conclude a favorite work does not always lead to success.
On the other hand, those who say that a profession chosen based on reality is more advantageous for teenagers emphasize that it supports financial security. Perhaps the foremost reason would be that work stability provides individuals with a steady monthly income, which would increase as they perform well and progress in their careers. However, this perspective overlooks the fact that working in an uninteresting field can lead to stress and depression. Under those circumstances, people are prone to give up, as they believe that life has no meaning, preventing them from valuable opportunities in the future.
In light of the aforementioned considerations, I am convinced that the freedom of determining one’s profession should be welcomed but with caution to avoid the risks due to the market competition. By carefully evaluating future potentials and oneself’s ability, young employees can find an occupation that is the perfect combination between stability and their personal aspirations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | ctbx312 | 89 | view |
| 2020-12-15 | harshad7600 | 56 | view |
| 2020-11-23 | HelenPr | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | evalinalisbeth | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | evalinalisbeth | 61 | view |
- Some people think young people should be free to choose his or her job but other people think they should be realistic and think more about their future Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 78
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- When people live in a foreign country they should follow local traditions and customs Do you agree or not 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why this is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to this place 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37003058104 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.977261726 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645259938838 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2298387021 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.076923077 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233587703831 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649687610265 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491660333687 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128232571947 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379261402859 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.