Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources (internet or television), To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In light of the mounting importance of education to each individual’s well-rounded development, the question of which provider of knowledge has the greatest influence on students has been a topic of public interest lately. One common proposal that many people, myself included, advocate is that learners acquire insight more effectively from educators than from others such as the Internet as well as the media.
Opponents of traditional teachers often cite the fact that learners can obtain more pivotal and practical knowledge from online sources that allow them to self-study and arrange a flexible learning schedule. Nonetheless, this thinking fails to factor in the enormous amount of content on the Internet that may overwhelm students, as evidenced by the fact that many online learners struggle to figure out where to begin and what to do next. That being the case, their educational experience can be extremely frustrating and unproductive. This is why it is necessary for pupils to have educators during the studying process, which ensures they can stay on the right track and avoid wasting time.
What is more, instructors are not only vehicles to impact academic insight but also partners who help youngsters improve their social skills. Through daily interactions with teachers and peers at school, children can learn how to behave and communicate in different circumstances. Therefore, if multimedia replaced teachers, these opportunities would be limited, which could negatively impact children's social performance. This can be seen in the Covid 19 lookdown, when students had to study online for a long time, and after returning to school, they were difficult to communicate and interact in person. This is a testament to the importance of educators in developing learners’ interpersonal abilities.
In a nutshell, I strongly support the belief that students can gain more from teachers than the Internet or televisions, considering their contributions to children’s comprehensive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-14 | Trandinhphuc8.0 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | ctbx312 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-02 | vuthuhien1510 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-27 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-27 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why this is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to this place 84
- Some people think young people should be free to choose his or her job but other people think they should be realistic and think more about their future Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays as women and men have to work full time household duties such as taking care children should be equally divided Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'lookdown' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'lookdowns'.
Suggestion: lookdowns
...mance. This can be seen in the Covid 19 lookdown, when students had to study online for ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, such as, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53398058252 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07888963406 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631067961165 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.949825378 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.5 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193694834043 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640406314054 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573291142934 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123910267079 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041913939442 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.