People have many different views about the method which is likely to tackle issues related to traffic and transportation. Many believe to solve these problems is to encourage the public to live in urban areas rather than suburb or rural areas. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this idea due to the following reasons.
First and foremost, a large number of citizens settling down in big downtown usually lead to traffic congestion. Indeed, street have tons of vehicles ranging from public transport systems to private ones. As a result, inhabitants of citites alwways deal with traffic jams in rush hours espcially. According to a survey by the Interrnational Vnexxpress newspapre, more than 90% of streets in the arge metropolis are overcrowded from 5pm to 7pm on a daily basic.
Futhermore, citizens who live in the centre tend to consume private means of transportation including cars and motorbikes apart from buses and expresss trains. Subsequently, there is a significant growth in air and water pollution due to emisssion from vehicles. Consequently, residents are at a higher risk of sufering from serious health problems such as lung cancer and digestive diseases. Therefoe, instead of governments recommending everyone inhabits cities, they should enhance the quality of transportation facilities or raise people’s awarenesss about travelling by public transportation in order to adddress trafic problem effectively.
In conclusion, although living in urban areas have numerous advantages, it is quite difficult to resolve the trafic and transportation issue due to traffic jams and pollution.
- The best way to solve traffic and transportation problems is to encourage people to live in cities rather than suburbs or countryside What extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 84
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 61
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles 61
- The diagram below shows how drinking water is produced using a solar powered water pump and water filter Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
People have many different views about the method which is likely ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...following reasons. First and foremost, a large number of citizens settling down in big downtown ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, apart from, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49397590361 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11615015169 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66265060241 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6645088787 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200342751548 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630800400324 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636387758452 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115887199159 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597769599174 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
People have many different views about the method which is likely ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...following reasons. First and foremost, a large number of citizens settling down in big downtown ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, apart from, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49397590361 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11615015169 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66265060241 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6645088787 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200342751548 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630800400324 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636387758452 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115887199159 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597769599174 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.