The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960, 2010.
The given charts compare the ratios of people working in different areas including manufacturing, sales and services in two towns in 1960 and 2010.
It is noticeable that in town B, manufacturing was the most popular sections that many people participating in among three areas during this period while in town A, the biggest change was witnessed in services.
As can be seen from the charts of town A, in 1960, the proportion of services was almost as popular as its sale, meanwhile manufacturing outnumbered and occupied 41%. The year 2010 witnessed a significant change in the ratios of these areas. While the percentage of services increased considerably and topped the chart with 64%, the figures of sales and manufacturing dropped 2 times and took up 16 and 21% respectively.
Looking into the charts of town B, although experiencing a slight decrease in 2010, the percentage of manufacturing was the most attractive among three areas, at 53%. The opposite was true for sales and services, these figures were saw significant growths at 25 and 22% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | letrang25011991 | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-19 | kieutrangkg1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | view |
- The best way to solve traffic and transportation problems is to encourage people to live in cities rather than suburbs or countryside What extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles 61
- If a product is good or meets people s needs they will buy it Therefore advertising is unnecessary and no more than entertainment To what extent do you agree or disagree Agree or Disagree 78
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 73
- It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
... sales and services, these figures were saw significant growths at 25 and 22% respe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04104157885 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1096095822 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295277814103 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140187456084 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115369237986 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204116896756 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102054927862 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.