Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

People have different views about stiff retribution for driving infractions are the key to reducing traffic collisions. Whilst there are those who maintain that upgrading road safety would be more efficient than sanction, I believe that it is a privilege for harsh punishments.

There are numerous reasons why people might argue that enhancing transport safety is more practical, one of which is adding more modern types of equipment such as cameras, road curd, and speed hump to inhibit people from traffic-related incidents. Erecting these kinds of equipment would prevent commuters from driving through red lights, or committing a speeding offense as they are monitored by the cameras system largely and they are warned not to infringe the traffic laws. Another justification for public safety protection is that the local authority should add additional electronic billboards with road safety instructional programs alongside the streets and roads where people drive. This would therefore inform the public about the detrimental effects of traffic violations.

Notwithstanding some critics’ objections, I support the view that tough penalties for traffic transgressions reap the benefits. First and foremost, stringent sentences such as heavy fines, and prison sentences would act as a deterrent to those who tend to infringe the law. For example, people who are caught drunk driving, excessively speeding, and causing road fatality will be subjected to heavier penalties such as license revocation. It should also be noted stiff retribution are a series of government crackdowns on reckless driving. People defying the traffic law, which would in turn incur stringent sanctions due to intentional violations.

In sum, while there are sensible reasons to believe that strict sentence for traffic offenses has drawbacks, my view is that they are outweighed by the benefits.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cameras'' or 'camera's'?
Suggestion: cameras'; camera's
...ng offense as they are monitored by the cameras system largely and they are warned not ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62237762238 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90435500735 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608391608392 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1109854196 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287576235312 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101639453153 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494644478942 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177305051373 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573177300335 0.056905535591 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.